Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
  • CE Courses
    • California Law and Ethics 6-Hour for LMFTs, LPCCs, & LCSWs
    • California Law and Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, & ASWs) – 2025
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
    • Supervision of California BBS Associates
    • Supervision for Clinical Effectiveness
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (11th ed)
    • Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2025 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
    • Saving Psychotherapy
  • Resources
    • Think Like the Test™ Podcast
    • Exam Prep Articles
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

California’s six-year rule for AMFTs, APCCs, and ASWs: An explainer

October 30, 2024February 15, 2018 by Ben Caldwell

Discussions about California’s “six-year rule” for associate marriage and family therapists (AMFTs), clinical counselors (APCCs), and clinical social workers (ASWs) often turn confusing. There’s a simple reason for that. When people refer to California’s “six-year rule,” they actually might be referring to either one of two different rules, both of which have six-year timeframes. Here’s a breakdown of both six-year rules.

1. An Associate registration is good for six years

Let’s say that Melissa is an APCC who just completed her graduate degree. (The specific profession doesn’t really matter. All three professions have parallel rules here.) She applies for associate registration, and is registered as of October 2024. That associate registration number she has been given is good for up to six years. (This, too, can get confusing: It technically “expires” every year unless it is renewed by the end of October. But it can be renewed for up to a total of six years.)

If her six years are up in October 2030, and Melissa has not gotten all the way to licensure, she can apply for a second associate registration number. The only thing that substantively changes under a second registration number is that Melissa can no longer work in a private practice.

2. Your most recent six years of experience count toward licensure

Let’s say that Melissa didn’t complete her hours before that 2030 deadline, and indeed did go ahead and get a second associate registration. Her hours don’t start back at zero. If she was close to being done with her hours, she’s still in good shape.

From the date of your application for clinical exam eligibility, the BBS will count backwards six years. Your supervised Associate experience during that six-year timeframe counts toward licensure, even if it was gained under two different registration numbers. This is the second six-year rule. It is backward-looking.

Many prelicensed therapists are currently working under a second registration, some even under a third or fourth. According to statistics from the Board of Behavioral Sciences [page 164], roughly one in eight associate MFTs at any given time is on a second (or later) registration. The same is true for one in 10 associate CSWs. It’s not at all unusual, nor is it especially problematic. Of course you want to make your way to licensure as quickly as possible, but life happens. Lots of people get sidetracked along the way. If you’re coming up on that six-year mark, don’t worry that all will be lost. Your recent experience stays with you.

And if you’re specifically working toward MFT licensure, you have one quirky advantage in the law: Your client contact hours from practicum — up to 500 of them — are forever countable toward licensure, no matter how old.

As you can see, these two rules work hand-in-hand, but they aren’t the same. So the next time someone comments or asks about the six-year rule, your first response should be, “Which one?”

Originally posted in 2018 through a partnership with our friends at Prelicensed.com. Check out their great blog, and job listings for paid prelicensed positions for prelicensed MFTs in California. Lightly updated and reposted October 2024.

Spread the word:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest

Related articles

Podcast episode 3: Student loan debt
California licensing board saves 90-day rule, stonewalls on MFT exam

📣 New Posts 📣

  • Value-based care in mental health: An explainer February 7, 2025
  • Marketing therapy after disasters January 12, 2025
  • Why are there so many delinquent APCC registrations? December 30, 2024
  • ASPPB gives up on requiring Psychology licensing boards to use the EPPP Part 2 October 29, 2024
  • How human therapists can thrive in a world of AI-based therapy August 19, 2024

Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam - front coverThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. This paperback includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

📈 Trending 📈

  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • A therapists' union is not the answer
  • An AI therapist can't really do therapy. Many clients will choose it anyway.
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • Therapy and coaching: Understanding the differences
High Pass Education logo

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of High Pass Education.

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2025 High Pass Education unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons or other licensing (information embedded).

Psychotherapy Notes, High Pass Education, and the High Pass Education logo are trademarks of High Pass Education.

The opinions expressed on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
  • CE Courses
    • California Law and Ethics 6-Hour for LMFTs, LPCCs, & LCSWs
    • California Law and Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, & ASWs) – 2025
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
    • Supervision of California BBS Associates
    • Supervision for Clinical Effectiveness
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (11th ed)
    • Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2025 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
    • Saving Psychotherapy
  • Resources
    • Think Like the Test™ Podcast
    • Exam Prep Articles
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy