Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

California licensing board saves 90-day rule, stonewalls on MFT exam

February 22, 2018 by Ben Caldwell

BBS logoGood news and bad news, I suppose, from today’s meeting of the California Board of Behavioral Sciences. The most important good news surrounds the 90-day rule for supervised experience between graduation and registration as an associate. Good stuff first!

The 90-day rule is safe

Back in November, the BBS Policy Committee voted to get rid of the 90-day rule. That rule — explained in more detail here — allows experience gained between graduation and associate registration to count toward license requirements for family therapists (MFTs) and clinical counselors (PCCs).

The decision to kill the 90-day rule wasn’t made lightly, but to the committee it seemed like the price they would have to pay to move Assembly Bill 93 forward. That bill includes a lot of other very positive changes in supervision standards, and concerns about the 90-day rule had the bill stuck in a legislative committee.

Thankfully, CAMFT stepped in with compromise language that protects the 90-day rule for most MFTs and PCCs, and should give the bill a path forward. The compromise would keep the 90-day rule for those whose employers require them to do Live Scan fingerprinting prior to gaining experience.

The BBS voted to move forward using CAMFT’s compromise plan, with some technical amendments. If AB93 passes through the legislature and is signed by the governor, supervision standards would change on January 1, 2019. Among the changes: Supervisors would need 15 hours of supervision training, and triadic supervision (one supervisor with two supervisees) could be counted as individual supervision.

California is leading on portability

Through its Portability Committee (which is meeting tomorrow), the BBS is actively taking a leadership role in addressing portability issues for the master’s level professions. Their draft language reflects a strong value on trusting other states’ boards, which would be a welcome shift. Applicants licensed in good standing in another state for at least two of the last five years would simply need to take a 12-hour course in California Law & Ethics, pass California’s Law & Ethics Exam, and fulfill a couple of additional CE requirements. (MFT applicants would probably also need to take California’s MFT Clinical Exam, a difficult issue which the committee sidestepped in its current discussion by starting with an LPCC framework.)

Details will still need to be fleshed out, and it’s a long way from draft committee language to state law. Still, the BBS should be applauded for taking a leadership role on portability.

Now the less-good stuff.

The California MFT Clinical Exam is discussed — privately

Today’s meeting started with a nearly two-hour closed-session discussion of the MFT Clinical Exam. We’ve talked about the exam’s problems here before. The pass rate fell off a cliff at the beginning of 2017, the state’s Office of Professional Examination Services gave some speculative excuses that all fall flat, and I pleaded for this to be given more attention in November.

We have no idea what was specifically discussed during today’s closed session. The board chair began the open session with a paragraph-long prepared statement, concluding, “We the board are confident that concerns about passing rates have been addressed by OPES.” There was no statement about how the concerns had been addressed, or even whether any problem was actually acknowledged. Suffice to say we don’t share the BBS’s confidence, and are now looking at additional remedies.

Application processing times are creeping upward

Here is the most current BBS data on application processing times. Bear in mind that these are *business* days, so 53 days equals about 10.5 weeks (possibly more, if there are holidays in there).

BBS application processing times

The upward creep isn’t great news, but some perspective is appropriate here. It wasn’t that long ago that applicants for MFT licensure were waiting eight months or more (see page 37 of the PDF) for their hours to be approved. By comparison, 53 days is pretty reasonable. And we remain hopeful that the streamlining of experience hours for licensure will make it easier for the board to process those applications. That would further reduce wait times.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

People who read this article also read

Post navigation
California’s six-year rule for MFTs, PCCs, and CSWs: An explainer
Announcing Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 5th edition
Saving Psychotherapy
Saving Psychotherapy: How therapists can bring the talking cure back from the brink
An action plan to improve your practice while helping the whole field. An unflinching, data-driven, and ultimately optimistic look at where we are and how your practice matters to all of our shared futures.
 
Get it on Amazon

People are reading

  • CareDash shuts down
  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • Eight interview tips when applying to an MFT graduate program
  • Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters

Recent Posts

  • CareDash shuts down February 3, 2023
  • How to diagnose telehealth connection problems January 18, 2023
  • Are licensing exam prep courses a good value? January 17, 2023
  • MFTs, Counselors will become Medicare providers in 2024 [updated] December 21, 2022

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 10th ed

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs - 10th edition front cover (c) Copyright 2023 Ben Caldwell LabsTenth edition (2023). A concise, digestible summary of vital elements of state law for master’s level therapists and mental health professionals.

Online California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep

Matthew Henry via Burst / Used under licenseBe ready for your test in 7 days with our study plan, video lectures, and practice questions. All for less than half of what competitors charge.
 
Start now

Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics ExamThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. Includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

Ben Caldwell Labs

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of Ben Caldwell Labs

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2023 Ben Caldwell Labs unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons licensing (information embedded).

Ben Caldwell Labs, the Ben Caldwell Labs logo, and Psychotherapy Notes are registered trademarks of Ben Caldwell Labs Inc.

The opinions expressed on posts on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, unless otherwise noted authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.