Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (8th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2019 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters

June 3, 2019January 4, 2017 by Ben Caldwell

Basics of California Law, 4th edition (2017) - (c) Copyright Benjamin E. CaldwellNote: The following opinion is a lightly-edited excerpt from the new fourth edition of Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs. Emotional Support Animal (ESA) letters are discussed in one of the book’s new “Room for Debate” segments. To see Emma Jaegle’s counterargument supporting therapists writing ESA letters, get the book. For more on what’s in the new edition, which is updated to 2017 state law, click here.

Emotional Support Animal laws

An Emotional Support Animal (ESA) is different from the trained and certified service animals used by individuals with disabilities. Unlike service animals, ESAs do not need any kind of training or certification, and they aren’t allowed everywhere. They are primarily legally recognized in two contexts. Under federal law, ESAs can fly for free, with their owner, on commercial flights. And under both California and federal law, ESAs also can accompany their owners in housing situations, even ones that do not normally allow pets or that would charge pet rent.

Individuals can have ESAs if they have obtained a letter of support from a therapist. There are very few rules or restrictions on how a therapist can determine whether to issue such a letter, or what the appropriate justification for allowing an ESA should be. This is a surprisingly loose system, and in the past 10 years, the use of ESAs has grown much faster than the use of other types of service animals.

Some therapists will issue ESA letters to any client who asks. Others refuse to write such letters at all. Between those extremes, others have developed their own criteria for when to issue ESA letters, though there is no standard set of criteria for decision-making in this area that therapists are required to follow.

In the absence of clear legal or ethical guidelines, is it appropriate for therapists to issue ESA letters at all?

Why therapists should not be involved

I’m a pet owner and an animal lover. But for a therapist considering whether to issue ESA letters, questions come up about our scope of practice, our scope of competence, our ethics, and ultimately, what the purpose is for our work.

Determining whether to write an ESA letter is not simply a matter of issuing a mental health diagnosis. It also involves assessing whether an ESA would meaningfully help. And therapists are typically not trained to make this determination. We are not trained to assess disability, and we cannot certify a client’s claim for disability benefits. Given this lack of training, writing ESA letters is arguably outside of our scope of practice.

Ethical questions arise as well. Our ethics demand that we intervene with our clients only in ways that we expect will benefit them. Studies on the benefits of ESAs are inconclusive at best.

Ultimately, these letters call forward a bigger question about our work: Who do we serve? If our purpose is simply to please our clients, then it makes sense to write ESA letters for anyone who asks. However, if our purpose is to help clients better integrate into the community around them, then it makes little sense to place a client’s convenience over the comfort and safety of others who may have allergies, phobias, or other concerns.

The current process for clients to obtain ESA letters from therapists is, unfortunately, ripe for abuse. There’s little to stop a client wanting their pet to be an ESA from getting together with a therapist who wants a quick buck. But we shouldn’t make decisions we aren’t trained for. ESA rules need to be strengthened. When that happens, we should be taken out of the process.

Want to learn more about ESAs? I teach a 1-hour, on-demand CE course on Emotional Support Animals over at SimplePractice Learning. You can enroll now. | CE provider approval info | Policy info (refunds, accommodations, etc.)

Share this:

  • Print
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • WhatsApp

People who read this article also read

Post navigation
Studying for MFT licensing exams
Four ways therapists waste their marketing budgets
Saving Psychotherapy
Saving Psychotherapy: How therapists can bring the talking cure back from the brink
An action plan to improve your practice while helping the whole field. An unflinching, data-driven, and ultimately optimistic look at where we are and how your practice matters to all of our shared futures.
 
Get it on Amazon

People are reading

  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters
  • Even when marijuana is legal, therapists who use it face risks
  • Eight interview tips when applying to an MFT graduate program

Recent Posts

  • This change in California child abuse reporting took 20 years March 25, 2021
  • 2021 Changes to the California MFT Clinical Exam December 30, 2020
  • Mean salary data for Psychologists, Counselors, MFTs, and Social Workers [interactive chart] September 9, 2020
  • Prologue: A poem for new grad students August 24, 2020

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 8th ed

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs, 8th edEighth edition (2021). A concise, digestible summary of vital elements of state law for master’s level therapists and mental health professionals.

Online California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep

Matthew Henry via Burst / Used under licenseBe ready for your test in 7 days with our study plan, video lectures, and practice questions. All for less than half of what competitors charge.
 
Start now

Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics ExamThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. Includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

Ben Caldwell Labs

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of Ben Caldwell Labs

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2021 Ben Caldwell Labs unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons licensing (information embedded).

Ben Caldwell Labs, the Ben Caldwell Labs logo, and Psychotherapy Notes are registered trademarks of Ben Caldwell Labs Inc.

The opinions expressed on posts on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, unless otherwise noted authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (8th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2019 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.