Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
  • CE Courses
    • California Law and Ethics 6-Hour for LMFTs, LPCCs, & LCSWs
    • California Law and Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, & ASWs) – 2025
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
    • Supervision of California BBS Associates
    • Supervision for Clinical Effectiveness
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (11th ed)
    • Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2025 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
    • Saving Psychotherapy
  • Resources
    • Think Like the Test™ Podcast
    • Exam Prep Articles
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Shaming is OK

October 15, 2018 by Ben Caldwell

Sarah Pflug / Burst / Used under license“Shame” is now a verb in therapist circles. It’s usually one we use pejoratively. We scold others for shaming, apparently with no sense of irony. We shame people for shaming other people.

As a noun, shame refers to a sense of sadness and embarrassment upon recognizing (or being told) that you’ve done something wrong. Cultures around the world understand the concept. We can safely say that experiencing shame is part of being human.

But as we do with anger, therapists often treat shame as if it were toxic even in small doses. Shame is actually a useful and necessary experience. We should teach clients how to use it effectively with others, and how to handle it themselves.

(An important caveat here. Some forms of shaming are indeed inappropriate and worthy of judgment. “Slut-shaming,” where women are judged for having sexuality, is deeply misogynistic no matter who is doing it. “Body-shaming” is similarly problematic.)

As a verb, to shame is to cause others to experience shame. It’s a useful way of influencing others’ behavior, letting them know when they have crossed personal or social boundaries. It’s a good thing when someone feels shame upon realizing that they, without intention, crossed such a boundary. It shows their desire to be good, to act in ways that maintain good relationships. The experience of shame can help cement a memory of that moment, such that the person knows not to cross that same boundary in the future.

Some draw a distinction between embarrassment (the sense of having done something socially wrong) and shame. In the eyes of those making the distinction, shame is deeper than embarrassment, and involves a sense of being something wrong. But this is a distinction without much of a difference. It’s a way of saying that experiencing embarrassment too deeply — or taking someone’s attempt to correct your behavior too personally — means it was the person setting the boundary who did something wrong. It avoids any need to take responsibility for the initial mistake.

This distinction, where embarrassment is seen as OK but shame is not, can even be framed as part of a tendency among some therapists to discourage clients from deep experience of any negative emotions, no matter how potentially useful that experience might be.

If your self-esteem is intact, you can feel shame once in a while and learn a great deal from it. It’s an important part of child development, and it doesn’t entirely go away once we become adults. We all make mistakes. It’s appropriate, especially for loved ones, to challenge not just our behavior but also the underlying morality of that behavior. That can be deeply painful, and also incredibly helpful.

Of course, shame shouldn’t be an everyday experience. No one wants someone we care about to solidify a belief that their personhood is bad. But shaming someone for having done something so inappropriate or hurtful that you find it morally wrong? It’s fine. It’s necessary, even. (Here’s an example of me, quite intentionally, shaming training sites for doing something I believe is wrong.) And when done appropriately, therapists should not be discouraging it.

Spread the word:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest

Related articles

I’ve got beef with the Talking Therapy podcast guys
The therapist friend

📣 New Posts 📣

  • ASWB misinformed examinees about changes to its social work exams May 19, 2025
  • Value-based care in mental health: An explainer February 7, 2025
  • Marketing therapy after disasters January 12, 2025
  • Why are there so many delinquent APCC registrations? December 30, 2024
  • ASPPB gives up on requiring Psychology licensing boards to use the EPPP Part 2 October 29, 2024

Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam - front coverThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. This paperback includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

📈 Trending 📈

  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • ASWB misinformed examinees about changes to its social work exams
  • An AI therapist can't really do therapy. Many clients will choose it anyway.
  • A therapist fact check of Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up
  • California sets new rules for therapists writing ESA letters
High Pass Education logo

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of High Pass Education.

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2025 High Pass Education unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons or other licensing (information embedded).

Psychotherapy Notes, High Pass Education, and the High Pass Education logo are trademarks of High Pass Education.

The opinions expressed on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
  • CE Courses
    • California Law and Ethics 6-Hour for LMFTs, LPCCs, & LCSWs
    • California Law and Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, & ASWs) – 2025
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
    • Supervision of California BBS Associates
    • Supervision for Clinical Effectiveness
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (11th ed)
    • Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2025 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
    • Saving Psychotherapy
  • Resources
    • Think Like the Test™ Podcast
    • Exam Prep Articles
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy