Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • CE Courses
    • California Law & Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, and ASWs) – 2023
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Resources
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Proposed Massachusetts law would give therapists collective bargaining

May 5, 2016March 8, 2016 by Ben Caldwell

USCurrency_Federal_ReserveThe so-called “gig economy” — best exemplified by ride-sharing companies like Uber and Lyft — has brought political attention to the plight of workers who are hired as independent contractors rather than employees. As independent contractors, these workers typically have no ability to engage in collective bargaining, often receive little or no benefits, and have limited workplace protections. The attention they are receiving might end up helping therapists and counselors who take insurance — or who would, if the pay and benefits were better. It could also help clients by improving accessibility of care.

As any therapist who serves on an insurance panel can tell you, the limitations of such work are frustrating. Generally speaking, you cannot discuss the fees you get with other therapists. And since most therapists each run individual businesses who are competing with one another, you can’t collectively bargain with the insurance company. (A group practice may contract as a unit with insurance providers, but even then, group practices tend to be made up of just a few therapists out of the hundreds or thousands on each insurer’s network.) And as many therapists on both sides of the fence can tell you, low reimbursement rates from insurance providers and managed care companies discourage many therapists from participating in insurance networks. That limits the number of providers available to clients in need of services.

New laws focused on the gig economy may wind up helping therapists by changing how collective bargaining works. Seattle went so far as to attempt a law specifically allowing Uber and Lyft drivers (as well as drivers for local taxi companies, who are also typically independent contractors) to seek union representation. A California lawmaker proposed the “1099 Self-Organizing Act,” which would allow independent contractors for companies like Uber and Lyft to organize for the purposes of collective bargaining if a certain percentage of the contractors chose to do so. While such laws are sure to face legal challenges, they at least demonstrate a new awareness among policymakers that independent contractors are vulnerable in ways that employees are not.

CliniciansUnited in Massachusetts

And that brings us to Massachusetts, where therapists have had the most success moving policymakers on the concerns specific to our field related to collective bargaining. Last year, the state group CliniciansUnited commissioned a survey of private practitioners asking for their experiences working with insurers and managed care companies. The findings of that survey are presented in this report (or you can just go here for the executive summary, or here if you prefer these things in video form.) Suffice to say they are depressing.

Armed with the findings from that report, state Senator David Wolf championed Senate Bill 649, which declared the power imbalance between insurers and clinicians to have resulted in a “market failure that threatens the availability of high quality, cost effective behavioral health, substance use disorder and mental health services.” The bill would have specifically exempted mental health and substance abuse treatment providers from state antitrust law, allowing them to collectively bargain with insurers and managed care companies.

The bill does not appear to have advanced past its first hearing last June. But the market problems in mental health aren’t going anywhere. The supposedly-expanded availability of care brought on by the Affordable Care Act will prove only to be an illusion if companies are unable or unwilling to pay what it would take to expand their provider networks. CliniciansUnited’s work shows that legislators can be convinced that the problems of independent contractors are not limited to drivers. Indeed, as their survey demonstrated, the overuse of independent contractors who cannot collectively bargain risks creating a market where mental health care is not available for many of those who have insurance that — at least in theory — should cover it.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

Related

The Last 100 Hours, Part 2: Is paying to track your hours worth it?
The Last 100 Hours, Part 3: The California Law and Ethics Exam

📈 Trending 📈

  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • California sets new rules for therapists writing ESA letters
  • Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters
  • Major changes are coming to California BBS supervision rules in 2022

📣 New Posts 📣

  • Write a letter to the editor: Drop the ASWB exams March 7, 2023
  • The mental health workforce shortage solution is right there February 14, 2023
  • The ASWB Clinical Exam reckoning has begun February 7, 2023
  • CareDash shuts down February 3, 2023
  • How to diagnose telehealth connection problems January 18, 2023
Ben Caldwell Labs

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of Ben Caldwell Labs

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2023 Ben Caldwell Labs unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons licensing (information embedded).

Ben Caldwell Labs, the Ben Caldwell Labs logo, and Psychotherapy Notes are registered trademarks of Ben Caldwell Labs Inc.

The opinions expressed on posts on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, unless otherwise noted authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • CE Courses
    • California Law & Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, and ASWs) – 2023
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Resources
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 10th ed

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs - 10th edition front cover (c) Copyright 2023 Ben Caldwell LabsTenth edition (2023). A concise, digestible summary of vital elements of state law for master’s level therapists and mental health professionals.