Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California MFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (9th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2022 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

NASW files FTC complaint over CareDash profiles funneling clients to BetterHelp [updated]

August 4, 2022August 2, 2022 by Ben Caldwell

The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) informed its members last week that CareDash, which operates a health care provider directory, is engaging in what “appears to be an improper deceptive practice.” NASW says that CareDash’s process of using clinician listings to direct prospective clients to online therapy platform BetterHelp rather than to the listed clinicians “potentially violates federal and/or state consumer protection laws.”

You cannot, in fact, check my availability using the button that says Check Availability.
Despite what a reasonable consumer would expect, you cannot, in fact, check my availability using the button that says Check Availability.

At issue is how CareDash is using its directory. If you search on the CareDash home page for a therapist who is listed on their site, you will be sent to that therapist’s profile page. (It is also possible that a prospective client searching for you on Google or another search engine might see your CareDash profile listed in search results, and go to your profile directly.) That profile page includes a “Check Availability” button, as well as a link to “see recommendations on how to Schedule an Appointment with [clinician’s name] online.”

But if the therapist hasn’t signed up with CareDash, those links will not lead to the therapist’s availability. In both cases, following those links will lead the user to language that “[Clinician’s name] has not provided a way to schedule online through CareDash. However, you could get connected with an online therapist or chat with our virtual assistant to get help finding a therapist.” These options all appear to direct to clinicians on the BetterHelp platform. CareDash says that they earn commissions through those links.

That is what has NASW concerned. Clients looking for a specific therapist, who may in fact have availability, are instead being redirected away from the therapist they searched for and funneled to BetterHelp. CareDash says that therapists wishing to update their information can claim their profile and then update it, making it easier for prospective clients to contact them directly. For those who do not wish to be listed on CareDash, the company states on their FAQ page that they do not remove profiles for any reason.

NASW cautions that these practices may or may not actually violate any state or federal law. CareDash’s directory is built from public data, including the information therapists submit when filing for an NPI number (necessary for insurance billing). However, because NASW believes CareDash’s practices to be deceptive, they have filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission and are encouraging individual clinicians who have been listed without their consent to file complaints as well. Those complaints can be filed with the FTC or your state Attorney General’s office.

I reached out to the media offices of both CareDash and BetterHelp for comment prior to publication of this article. Neither company had replied as of the time of initial publication.

Update 8/4/22: BetterHelp responded, noting that it had ended its affiliate agreement with CareDash: “We appreciate the concern raised in this instance. CareDash is an entirely separate company, and we do not control their business practices. […] Since we’ve learned of some concerns raised about CareDash, we’ve stopped promoting BetterHelp on their website and have ended the arrangement.”

Updated 8/3/22 with minor clarifying edits.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

People who read this article also read

Post navigation
California MFT program costs vary — by more than $100,000
Social work exam data shows major racial disparities
Saving Psychotherapy
Saving Psychotherapy: How therapists can bring the talking cure back from the brink
An action plan to improve your practice while helping the whole field. An unflinching, data-driven, and ultimately optimistic look at where we are and how your practice matters to all of our shared futures.
 
Get it on Amazon

People are reading

  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • Social work exam data shows major racial disparities
  • California sets new rules for therapists writing ESA letters
  • Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters

Recent Posts

  • Social work exam data shows major racial disparities August 9, 2022
  • NASW files FTC complaint over CareDash profiles funneling clients to BetterHelp [updated] August 2, 2022
  • California MFT program costs vary — by more than $100,000 July 25, 2022
  • 15 years of therapist salary data for Psychologists, counselors, social workers, and MFTs July 11, 2022

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 9th ed

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs - 9th edition front cover (c) Copyright 2022 Ben Caldwell LabsNinth edition (2022). A concise, digestible summary of vital elements of state law for master’s level therapists and mental health professionals.

Online California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep

Matthew Henry via Burst / Used under licenseBe ready for your test in 7 days with our study plan, video lectures, and practice questions. All for less than half of what competitors charge.
 
Start now

Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics ExamThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. Includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

Ben Caldwell Labs

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of Ben Caldwell Labs

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2022 Ben Caldwell Labs unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons licensing (information embedded).

Ben Caldwell Labs, the Ben Caldwell Labs logo, and Psychotherapy Notes are registered trademarks of Ben Caldwell Labs Inc.

The opinions expressed on posts on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, unless otherwise noted authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California MFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (9th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2021 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2022 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.