Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
  • CE Courses
    • California Law and Ethics 6-Hour for LMFTs, LPCCs, & LCSWs
    • California Law and Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, & ASWs) – 2025
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
    • Supervision of California BBS Associates
    • Supervision for Clinical Effectiveness
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (11th ed)
    • Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2025 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
    • Saving Psychotherapy
  • Resources
    • Think Like the Test™ Podcast
    • Exam Prep Articles
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Lift the ban on soliciting testimonials

January 19, 2017 by Ben Caldwell

Basics of California Law, 4th edition (2017) - (c) Copyright Benjamin E. CaldwellNote: The following opinion is a lightly-edited excerpt from the new fourth edition of Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs. The ban on soliciting testimonials from clients is discussed in one of the book’s new “Room for Debate” segments. To see Emma Jaegle’s counterargument supporting the ban, get the book. For more on what’s in the new edition, which is updated to 2017 state law, click here.

Accountability is a major problem in the mental health professions. Many therapists never bother to truly measure the effectiveness of their work, leaving them overconfident in their skills and unaware of their deficits. It is little wonder that prospective clients don’t trust us to be the sole sources of information about how great we are. They want to hear from others we have worked with.

Unfortunately, they can’t get that information in a way that is helpful or accurate, in part because the ethics codes of most mental health professional associations ban their members from soliciting client testimonials. The few clients who do post their experiences unsolicited often do so out of anger over bad experiences, rather than satisfaction with good ones.

I am in agreement with Emma [Jaegle, who writes in the book in favor of keeping the testimonial ban in place] that the problems of volunteer bias and negativity bias make online reviews of therapists inherently untrustworthy… as they are now. There is a solution to this problem, though, and it’s allowing therapists to ask more clients to share their experiences online.

We’ve all had an experience at a hotel, restaurant, or store where employees were pushy in asking for reviews. If therapists started similarly begging, we would come off as tacky salespeople, and it would alter the power dynamic between therapist and client. But lifting the ban on solicitation of testimonials would not be likely to have this effect, for one key reason: The existing rules against abusing therapist power would remain in place. So asking for an online review could become acceptable, while pressuring for it or demanding it would still be prohibited.

Existing clients can (as they already do) make informed choices about when to value their confidentiality and when to value sharing their experience. Prospective clients clearly hunger for a broader range of information about therapists than just what we use to try to sell ourselves. Our policies should allow them access to the better, broader range of information that client testimonials could provide.

Spread the word:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest

Related articles

Four ways therapists waste their marketing budgets
Texas Supreme Court reverses earlier ruling, allows MFT diagnosis

📣 New Posts 📣

  • ASWB misinformed examinees about changes to its social work exams May 19, 2025
  • Value-based care in mental health: An explainer February 7, 2025
  • Marketing therapy after disasters January 12, 2025
  • Why are there so many delinquent APCC registrations? December 30, 2024
  • ASPPB gives up on requiring Psychology licensing boards to use the EPPP Part 2 October 29, 2024

Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam - front coverThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. This paperback includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

📈 Trending 📈

  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • Counselor and therapist licensure: Does testing raise quality?
  • California sets new rules for therapists writing ESA letters
  • A therapist fact check of Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up
High Pass Education logo

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of High Pass Education.

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2025 High Pass Education unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons or other licensing (information embedded).

Psychotherapy Notes, High Pass Education, and the High Pass Education logo are trademarks of High Pass Education.

The opinions expressed on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
  • CE Courses
    • California Law and Ethics 6-Hour for LMFTs, LPCCs, & LCSWs
    • California Law and Ethics for BBS Associates (AMFTs, APCCs, & ASWs) – 2025
    • Telehealth for California LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs
    • Supervision of California BBS Associates
    • Supervision for Clinical Effectiveness
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (11th ed)
    • Preparing for the 2025 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2025 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
    • Saving Psychotherapy
  • Resources
    • Think Like the Test™ Podcast
    • Exam Prep Articles
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy