Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Applying for disability accommodations on licensing exams

June 15, 2017 by Ben Caldwell

Ryan McGuire / Gratisography - licensed under Creative Commons ZeroIf you have a recognized disability, you can apply for a quiet room, additional time, or other appropriate accommodations for your licensing exam. Exact rules, and the process for applying, will vary by state. But every state has to make reasonable accommodations in the exam process under federal law.

Though there is little hard data, I’ve heard from multiple people who work for state licensing boards around the country that requests for disability accommodations are becoming more common in license exams for psychologists, counselors, social workers, and family therapists.

Folks I’ve talked to about this suggest three possible reasons.

  • Examinees are less concerned about stigma when asking for accommodations.
  • With better accommodations along the way, more therapists with disabilities are making it through the pipeline to licensure.
  • More examinees are aware of the possibility of accommodations.

Each of those is good, and each probably has some truth to it. There’s also a fourth reason, spoken about in quieter tones, but also true: Examinees are sometimes desperate for any advantage they can get on their exam, considering how high the stakes are. They may apply for accommodations with weak justification, or even knowing that there is not actual justification, under the belief that the worst that can happen is the response is “no.”

Physical disabilities typically must be assessed and documented by physicians. Mental health disabilities can sometimes be assessed and documented by other therapists. (Again, rules vary by state.) Therapists are placed in a difficult position when a client, who is a therapist approaching the exam stage, asks the licensed therapist to provide a diagnosis simply to facilitate disability accommodations on the license exam. (This is similar to what’s happening with Emotional Support Animals. The only difference is what the client wants the therapist to write a letter for.) As a result, state licensing boards may be growing more skeptical of disability accommodation requests, particularly when the disability is related to mental health.

There are no villains here. It is appropriate for someone who believes they have a disability to seek out the diagnosis and documentation necessary for them to receive accommodations. If a client requests that a licensed therapist document a questionable disability, it is understandable for the licensed therapist to simply provide the documentation their client wants rather than risking a confrontation. And the exams themselves do not appear to serve their public protection purpose, so it makes sense when many take an attitude toward them that amounts to “just find a way through it.” But when all of these factors are present, it also makes sense for licensing boards to tighten their requirements for examinees to receive accommodations.

If you’re considering applying for disability accommodations on your exam, here are a few things to hold in mind.

  1. Accommodations are meant to level the playing field in test conditions, not test performance. If you have a vision impairment that makes it difficult to stare at a screen for extended periods, paper-and-pencil testing best provides you with fair conditions for the exam. But that change in conditions does not impact how much you know. No one is entitled to accommodations that make up for being less prepared or simply more nervous about the exam.
  2. You may need to provide documentation that the disability impacts daily functioning. If the only impact of your anxiety disorder is that you struggle on tests, it may not meet the state’s definition of a disability. A genuine disability interferes with daily functioning and is not limited to a single event or professional task.
  3. You may need to provide documentation that the disability is not new or simply convenient. Licensing boards will be understandably skeptical of an anxiety disorder or other mental health diagnosis that has arisen immediately prior to a license exam. They will be especially skeptical if they grant accommodations for an initial exam (like the law and ethics exam many states offer at the beginning of supervised experience), get a request for accommodations for a second exam (at the end of the supervised experience), and see no documentation of any treatment or anything else related to the disability during the time between the exams. Such a pattern has the appearance of being driven by a desire to gain an advantage on the test.
  4. Test anxiety is not a disability. If it was, almost everyone taking a licensing exam in mental health would qualify as disabled, and the term would lose its meaning. Your licensing exam is high-stakes, and it is understandable to be anxious about it. But justifiable anxiety is not adequate justification to be given extra time or other accommodations.

As I’ve said before, license exams are high-stakes, so it’s ok to be nervous about them. Obviously, don’t apply for disability accommodations unless you have an actual disability that impacts daily functioning outside of the testing context. If you do have a disability, having a good paper trail documenting the disability and any prior accommodations received (even in other contexts) may be helpful. The testing process may be less than ideal, but all of us — licensees, examinees, and the boards themselves — want a process that is fair and accessible to all who have earned the right to be there.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

People who read this article also read

Post navigation
New Mexico, Nevada, Connecticut ban conversion therapy for minors
What single-payer health care would mean for California therapists
Saving Psychotherapy
Saving Psychotherapy: How therapists can bring the talking cure back from the brink
An action plan to improve your practice while helping the whole field. An unflinching, data-driven, and ultimately optimistic look at where we are and how your practice matters to all of our shared futures.
 
Get it on Amazon

People are reading

  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • CareDash shuts down
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?
  • Eight interview tips when applying to an MFT graduate program
  • Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters

Recent Posts

  • CareDash shuts down February 3, 2023
  • How to diagnose telehealth connection problems January 18, 2023
  • Are licensing exam prep courses a good value? January 17, 2023
  • MFTs, Counselors will become Medicare providers in 2024 [updated] December 21, 2022

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 9th ed

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs - 9th edition front cover (c) Copyright 2022 Ben Caldwell LabsNinth edition (2022). A concise, digestible summary of vital elements of state law for master’s level therapists and mental health professionals.

Online California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep

Matthew Henry via Burst / Used under licenseBe ready for your test in 7 days with our study plan, video lectures, and practice questions. All for less than half of what competitors charge.
 
Start now

Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics ExamThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. Includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

Ben Caldwell Labs

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of Ben Caldwell Labs

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2023 Ben Caldwell Labs unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons licensing (information embedded).

Ben Caldwell Labs, the Ben Caldwell Labs logo, and Psychotherapy Notes are registered trademarks of Ben Caldwell Labs Inc.

The opinions expressed on posts on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, unless otherwise noted authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.