Skip to content
Psychotherapy Notes
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy

Three easy ways to collect outcome data

April 16, 2018April 16, 2018 by Jeffrey Liebert

Sarah Pflug / Burst / Used under licenseTherapists and counselors are increasingly required to formally gather outcome data on their work. This is good: The more data that we have on our work, the more intentional and effective our clinical decisions can become. Regularly collecting and attending to outcome data, therefore, suggests constant movement towards improvement.

Many therapists struggle, however, with questions about what data to gather, and how to best gather it. Even among those who philosophically agree that regularly collecting outcome data helps to more meaningfully direct therapy, they often don’t do it.

Thankfully, there are a number of easy ways for therapists to collect outcome data. Many come at no cost. The following are just three of the many different tools/assessments therapists can use to collect and interpret outcome data.

Session Rating Scale and Outcome Rating Scale

The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and the Session Rating Scale (SRS) were developed by Scott Miller, Barry Duncan, and Lynn Johnson. These two assessments were designed to be incredibly brief, intuitive, and easy to administer. Clients simply rate their experience by placing a mark along a 10cm line. The therapist then measures the location of that mark to determine a score out of 10. The line intentionally has no markers so that clients don’t feel obligated to mark a specific “score.” The ORS is a four-question scale designed to be given at the beginning of each session, measuring therapeutic progress to date. The SRS is a four-question scale designed to be given at the end of each session, measuring the client’s response to that specific meeting. When administered regularly, these assessments can provide incredibly meaningful feedback about client satisfaction and potential client dropout. Individual licenses to use the measures are free.

DSM-5 Level 1 measure

The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure helps clinicians to more effectively and efficiently identify additional areas of inquiry that are likely to impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment. The measure is a 23 question, self- or informant-rated measure that assesses 13 mental health domains. The domains assessed include: depression, anger, mania, anxiety, somatic symptoms, suicidal ideation, psychosis, sleep problems, memory, repetitive thoughts and behaviors, dissociation, personality functioning, and substance use. Each domain inquires about how much the client has been bothered by the specific problem during the past 2 weeks. Domains with significant responses should then be further addressed through use of the DSM-5 Level 2 Symptom Measures. The Level 2 measures provide more detailed information on the specific symptoms associated with Level 1 domains.

One benefit of the Level 1 measure is that if it is given at regular intervals, it can be used to track changes in the client’s symptoms over time. All of the DSM measures are free.

Symptom-specific measures

In some settings though, professionals or clinics specialize in working with clients with a specific diagnosis. One such example would be for a clinical specializing in Substance Use Disorders. In that clinic, the above DSM-5 level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure would likely not be an effective use of time. That being said, there are a number of more specific assessments that those settings can, and should use.

An example of a symptom-specific assessment is The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST), which helps clinicians to assess for the frequency of use and abuse of substances. The assessment begins with a pre-screen that determines whether the client has ever used any substances in their lifetime. By identifying clients who have never used any substances in their lifetime, clinicians are able to switch to an assessment tool that better predicts future risk of substance use. If a client has used any substance in their lifetime, then the clinician can administer the NIDA-Modified ASSIST.

The assessment is composed of 7 questions, with each question having specifiers for each of the 9 identified categories of substances. The questions assess for substance use over lifetime, use over the past 3 months, and even attempts to stop use. The client’s responses to each of the questions will determine their score, or risk level, for continued substance abuse. The NIDA-Modified ASSIST identifies three different score ranges: Lower Risk (0-3), Moderate Risk (4-26), and High Risk (27+). In addition, because the assessment measures lifetime use, it also provides a score range for each substance that the patient has used in their entire lifetime.

Whether you chose to use the above tools or one of the many other options available to you, what matters most is that you are consistently collecting data. Attending to the client feedback provided by these measures has been repeatedly shown to have positive impacts on the therapeutic alliance and achievement of treatment goals.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet

People who read this article also read

Post navigation
“I’m just an MFT student”
Podcast episode 6: Psychotherapy’s gender gap
Saving Psychotherapy
Saving Psychotherapy: How therapists can bring the talking cure back from the brink
An action plan to improve your practice while helping the whole field. An unflinching, data-driven, and ultimately optimistic look at where we are and how your practice matters to all of our shared futures.
 
Get it on Amazon

People are reading

  • CareDash shuts down
  • Decoding counselor alphabet soup: LPC, LPCC, LMHC, and more
  • Therapists should not write Emotional Support Animal letters
  • California sets new rules for therapists writing ESA letters
  • What's the difference between an MFT (or LMFT), an LPC (or LPCC), and an LCSW?

Recent Posts

  • CareDash shuts down February 3, 2023
  • How to diagnose telehealth connection problems January 18, 2023
  • Are licensing exam prep courses a good value? January 17, 2023
  • MFTs, Counselors will become Medicare providers in 2024 [updated] December 21, 2022

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs – 10th ed

Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs - 10th edition front cover (c) Copyright 2023 Ben Caldwell LabsTenth edition (2023). A concise, digestible summary of vital elements of state law for master’s level therapists and mental health professionals.

Online California MFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep

Matthew Henry via Burst / Used under licenseBe ready for your test in 7 days with our study plan, video lectures, and practice questions. All for less than half of what competitors charge.
 
Start now

Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam

Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics ExamThe easiest way to get ready for California’s MFT Law & Ethics exam. Includes a study guide and more than 100 practice test questions with rationales.

Ben Caldwell Labs

Psychotherapy Notes is the official blog of Ben Caldwell Labs

All content and images © Copyright 2009-2023 Ben Caldwell Labs unless otherwise noted.
Some images are used under Creative Commons licensing (information embedded).

Ben Caldwell Labs, the Ben Caldwell Labs logo, and Psychotherapy Notes are registered trademarks of Ben Caldwell Labs Inc.

The opinions expressed on posts on this site are solely those of the author.
While this blog does sometimes cover legal issues, unless otherwise noted authors are practicing clinicians and not attorneys.
Nothing here should be interpreted as legal advice, nor should it be considered a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney.
  • Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Clinical Exam Prep
    • California LMFT Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LPCC Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • California LCSW Law & Ethics Exam Prep
    • National MFT Exam Test Bank
  • Advocacy
  • Books
    • Basics of California Law for LMFTs, LPCCs, and LCSWs (10th ed)
    • Saving Psychotherapy
    • Preparing for the 2023 California MFT Law & Ethics Exam
    • Preparing for the 2023 California Clinical Social Work Law & Ethics Exam
  • Blog
    • Blog home
    • Psychology
    • Professional Counseling
    • Family therapy
    • Clinical social work
    • Law and ethics
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Licensure
    • Public policy
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.